Posted on 10/24/2010 11:03:54 AM PDT by jazusamo
Full article here. Some parts (Washington Post portions indented):
As to the administrations mindset:
Civil rights officials from the Bush administration have said that enforcement should be race-neutral. But some officials from the Obama administration, which took office vowing to reinvigorate civil rights enforcement, thought the agency should focus primarily on cases filed on behalf of minorities.
The Voting Rights Act was passed because people like Bull Connor were hitting people like John Lewis, not the other way around, said one Justice Department official not authorized to speak publicly, referring to the white Alabama police commissioner who cracked down on civil rights protesters such as Lewis, now a Democratic congressman from Georgia.
Translation: J. Christian Adams and Chris Coates, two former trial attorneys, testified truthfully under oath on this point; civil rights chief Thomas Perez did not.
As for the involvement of higher-ups:
Asked at a civil rights commission hearing in May whether any of the departments political leadership was involved in the decision to dismiss the Panthers case, assistant attorney general for civil rights Thomas E. Perez said no.
This is a case about career people disagreeing with career people, said Perez, who was not in the department at the time. He also said that political appointees are regularly briefed on civil rights cases and, whenever there is a potentially controversial decision, we obviously communicate that up the chain.
Justice Department records turned over in a lawsuit to the conservative group Judicial Watch show a flurry of e-mails between the Civil Rights Division and the office of Associate Attorney General Thomas Perelli, a political appointee who supervises the division.
Translation: Perez did not exactly say the truth under oath.
The administration must be awfully panicky. Lots of DOJ attorneys assisted in preparing false responses to discovery requests from the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. The administration repeatedly misrepresented the facts in public. The Justice Department tried to prevent percipient witnesses from testifying pursuant to subpoenas. Perez testified under oath untruthfully. The Obama administration stonewalled both the commission and congressmen trying to uncover the facts which conservative outlets and now the Post have revealed. The DOJ tried to bully attorneys who were prepared to tell the truth. There is a term for that: obstruction of justice.
Translation: Perez and Fernandes will have to go.
From linked Jennifer Rubin article:
And whats more, GOP committee chairmen with subpoena power will take over in January when the new Congress convenes. Expect hearings, some resignations, and maybe a prosecution or two. The small potatoes story the mainstream media pooh-poohed will be the first serious scandal of the last two years of Obamas term. Do I hear that Eric Holder wants to spend more time with his family?
All three have to go and Holder would be wise to go now before investigations eve begin.
A new Alinsky tactic to use a criticism as a balcanizing issue to light a fire under the media in their favor, further divide Americans, now on simple things like the meaning of equal justice. Unreal.
The Obama-Holder Department of Just Us, Cracker.
Civil rights officials from the Bush administration have said Federal law demands that enforcement should must be race-neutral.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.