Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: csmusaret

You may have (unwittingly) just illustrated the problem.


28 posted on 10/24/2010 7:44:31 AM PDT by FourPeas (Pester not the geek, for the electrons are his friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: FourPeas

Connect the dots. It’s not so simple to ‘blame females’.

Like it or not, MALES are the evolutionary engine..MALES are the gender that takes greater risk, MALES are naturally more dominate.

Females BY NATURE must ‘get along’ to survive and protect offspring...the out-lyer females do exist that shake it up—but the majority wants to keep it “steady”, for survival of the nest—females are the evolutionary rock, males the engine—for good AND bad.

The female will not upend the applecart as easily. But the female will go for the male that demonstrates power because it represents protection.

Too many not-big-picture thinking females attracted to Clinton because of the power he represented. If males en masse ( media, all) had banded together and ostracized him—rightfully—he would have been disgraced and cast out, the ultimate in WEAKNESS, his allure would have been extinquished.

Males do set the agenda.

Accept this.


32 posted on 10/24/2010 7:54:27 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson