Shame on him. He should know better than to preach slavery, even in jest (of which this odious remark was not).
“Shame on him. He should know better than to preach slavery, even in jest.”
As I understand the doctrine, it is not of slavery per se, so much as it is of servitude and second class status. More like apartheid or Jim Crowe with diminished and inferior rights rather than chattel slavery where one is property.
Theologically, I wonder how this school of thought deals with jubilee?