To: Libloather
This looks like an extension of the already existing Keystone pipeline. I imagine the operational records from it should give some idea of the slim risk posed by the extension.
To: Libloather
The question we should be asking "How much is she and Bill going to get from this?"
3 posted on
10/23/2010 9:56:34 AM PDT by
darkwing104
(Lets get dangerous)
To: Libloather
U.S. State Department defends Hillary Clinton remarks endorsing Canadian (dirty oil) pipeline To all liberals, all oil is "dirty".
Electricity, though, is "clean" -- because it comes out of the wall plug.
4 posted on
10/23/2010 10:02:59 AM PDT by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
To: Libloather
The 2,673-km Keystone XL pipeline would bring oil from tar sands of Canada's Alberta to refineries in Texas. Forget the polar bears and caribou, what about the prairie dogs and the "endangered" Texas prairie chicken (Mike Nesmith)? The herds of prairie dogs and prairie chickens will be decimated across the fruited plain due to their inability to copulate because of the pipeline running through their bedrooms.
sarc/
5 posted on
10/23/2010 10:10:07 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Which are you voting for on November 2nd? Freedom and liberty or FREE ice cream?)
To: Libloather
We could then connect the Green River Formation oil project and it's 1 TRILLION barrels of recoverable oil to the Keystone XL Pipeline. The Green River pipeline would run about 883.34 miles from near Salt Lake to somewhere near Lincoln, NE. next to the alraedy I80 Interstate.
6 posted on
10/23/2010 10:14:18 AM PDT by
WellyP
To: Libloather
There is no tar in the Alberta oilsands.
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
9 posted on
10/23/2010 8:41:16 PM PDT by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson