WSJ articles are not for endorsements. To assume that is just silly. If you don’t think this is stronger than standing on a soapbox and proclaiming it as an endorsement, you are missing the value of the article entirely.
Exactly correct!!! Pete DuPont has found the best medium (WSJ) to clearly identify the issues in the race. He isn't going to embarrass the WSJ by using as a venue for a blatant political endorsement.
Sometimes we forget that the progressives still control the mainstream media. That is slowly changing, but until it is more balanced we have to wisely use the venues that we've got.