Posted on 10/22/2010 7:13:45 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
Sarah Palin has unquestionably made her voice heard in this election cycle - but if the GOP falls short of taking back the Senate as most prognosticators expect, the Pride of Wasilla will take a hit from party leaders who think she turns off independents.
"If we don't win the Senate I have one thing to say: ‘Thank you, Sarah Palin,'" a household name and bigtime player in Republican circles tells The Mouth.
This source and several other party elders believe Palin's endorsement of Christine O'Donnell has made a difficult Senate seat pickup in ideologically centrist Delaware hopeless.
They also believe Palin could be the difference between winning and losing in several other Senate races, including Nevada and California.
Palin is extremely unpopular among indie voters, especially in California. A recent Field Poll found that 69% of California independent voters have an unfavorable opinion of Palin. And independents are nearly a quarter of the California electorat
(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...
LOL, you are one of those off the deep end guys, I don’t care what you think.
The subject of this thread has importance, your opinions and obsessions do not.
You should make a sincere effort to tune into the thread topic, and the current political situation, and what it means for how the establishment is attempting to take out the conservative front runner for the primaries that start in a few weeks.
Whenever a “bigtime, household, name insider” who cannot give his name, is the “source,” for a shot at Sarah Palin, I discount everything the coward says for precisely it *is*...
SARAH PALIN ‘envy’ and a further attempt by the RINO machine to stop her from gaining more power....LOL.
Good luck with that, fossil “reach across the aisle” Senate incumbents, US Senate watchers, Rove and American Crossroads, campaign managers for Romney & Huckabee and you all’s minions in the lamestream press.
GO SARAH!
You may decide to slink off forn the moment, but those positions of Palins are not monor points.
The flood of illegals is intimately tied to the exploding deficit, and through the construction industry to tthe housing bubble and its inevitable collapse.
Shallow thinking on your part does not make an important issue just go away.
You will be confronted by these same questions again. If not by me, then by some one else.
La La La You’re not listening and the question is stupid anyway is not really a good or intelligent response to the questions.
The questions are not stupid, or irrational. They do seem to be beyond your paygrade to attempt to answer.
It's hard for me to decide, 65% Mittenish / 35% Huckstering.
Shallow thinking is you unable to even know what this thread is about, and the significance of it’s subject, but my guess is that you are used to people telling you things like that.
Yeah, right! It will be Steele and Rove and the rest of the inwsiders who will go down BIG TIME. The rest of us out here have had it with these country club losers who don’t know how to fight.
I’m not pro Mitt. He’s unacceptable. But I’d guess Rove over Mitt just because Mitt has been keeping a low profile, somewhat, recently. It was Rove and his neocon buddies who were attacking Christine. Rove is all over tv these days talking about how important he is. I’d like to see Rove, his neocon buddies, and Mitt and his people all gone.
“I’d like to see Rove, his neocon buddies, and Mitt and his people all gone.”
Got that right!
I still think it’s Mitt though, because with Rove the stab wounds will be in the front......
With Mitt the stab wounds will all be in the back.....It’s Mitt, Jim....
Unnamed source = bullsh*t. You people are just making it up now...
I am all for a big long wall along with land mines to keep that crap out and McCain is a nutball!!!
The Daily News is happy to be part of the “Republican Party Split” story attempting to save the Democrats. The day I see a headline reading, “Barak Obama in DNC Leader’s Bullseye If Dems Fall Short in November”, I might reconsider. JK...no I won’t.
Leaders? No. Leaders put their name to what they believe and stand behind it. “Sources” like this may very well hold high ranks and titles, but they’re not leaders. These people meow when they talk.
I’m not sure Mitt actually qualifies as a household name, though.
“I’m not sure Mitt actually qualifies as a household name, though.”
You’d be surprised on how many nominal small c conservatives think that Mitt is our salvation because of his supposed business experience. They forget about his liberal/RINO governing record. I think a few of those are starting to come around though.
Meg Whitman, here in California will be another Mitt Romney style governor.....too bad, many here deserve better than that.......sigh......Real Conservatives don’t want to deal with the way lefty Legislature and Public Employees Unions......it’s a toxic atmosphere....especially when you throw in the lefty press. Only good side of Whitman is that she’ll be the best arguement against Mitt in the longer term.
“I’m not sure Mitt actually qualifies as a household name, though.”
He is in my House, course using it will cause your mouth to be washed out with soap! lololol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.