To: donozark
My thoughts as well. The HMS Sheffield essentially “melted” after being struck by an Exocet missile. Burned for 6 days, then sank. Aluminum is fine for bass boats, not so war vessels... Nope. Damage was from internal fire of flammable fittings.
Sheffield was a steel ship anyway
Note damage below. Paint is blistered off the hull, and fibreglass stack and radar dome are cooked, but structure and above deck fittings are intact (even the aluminium boat).
NB this is a offside picture of the side not hit.
![](http://www.thenewscentre.co.uk/falklands/graphics/seff.jpg)
15 posted on
10/22/2010 9:06:37 AM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(15 October 09: Where were you when America stopped to watch an empty balloon?)
To: Oztrich Boy
Ok. It was the Ardent that had the aluminum superstructure. But it got hit with 6-7 bombs, so it would have made little difference.
My understanding is that although the Exocet missile itself did not explode on impact, nor did the delay mechanism work, the rocket motor caught fuel on fire and knocked out the water equipment used to fight the fire?
.There are many articles out there stating aluminum was used in construction of Sheffield. Thanx for correcting me!
16 posted on
10/22/2010 9:27:10 AM PDT by
donozark
(43 years of therapy made me the man I am today....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson