Posted on 10/20/2010 3:00:23 PM PDT by Syncro
CHRIS COONS LIED, GRANNY DIED
October 20, 2010
In all of life's tribulations, there is nothing so aggravating as being condescended to by an idiot. In last week's CNN debate in the Delaware Senate race between the astonishingly well-spoken Christine O'Donnell and the unfortunate-looking Chris Coons, O'Donnell had to put up with it from Coons for 90 minutes.
O'Donnell wiped the floor with Coons, moderators Wolf Blitzer and Nancy Karibjanian, and the idiotic University of Delaware students asking questions -- all of whom were against her.
(With the nation on the verge of another great depression -- the brunt of which, to my delight, will fall most heavily on college students -- guess what the dunderheads asked? GUESS! That's right: They asked about abortion "in the case of rape or incest," "don't ask, don't tell," doing something about "our carbon footprint," and the kook-minister who was going to burn Korans, because ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE, I TELL YOU!)
O'Donnell's responses couldn't have been better if Thomas Sowell were whispering them in her ear. But after every well-thought-out answer she gave, Coons would act as if O'Donnell were speaking in tongues and make a dismissive remark to the moderators: "If you can reconcile all those comments, you're an even more talented reporter than I think you are, Nancy."
(O'Donnell managed to simply answer the questions without wasting everyone's time with snippy asides about Coons' replies.)
Then Coons would say something incomprehensible, false or insane -- such as his conspiracy theory about the Australians uniting with the Chinese against America.
Yes, Australia, America's most loyal ally.
After O'Donnell described the China problem with absolute precision -- the Chinese hold so much of our debt, we can't hold them accountable in their dealings with Iran or North Korea -- Coons smirkingly replied: "It's hard for me to respond effectively, Wolf, to all the different issues that my opponent has raised in previous statements, and I'll just let that stand."
Then he launched his Chinese-Australian conspiracy theory!
Coons said: "The Australian navy engaged in joint exercises with the Chinese and specifically excluded us recently. A dramatic shift in the Australian policy."
Somehow, The New York Times had missed the national security implications of Australia's engaging in naval exercises with China! Either that or Coons is Dennis Kucinich, I've-got-eight-test-tube-babies-and-I'm-broke crazy.
Weirdly, though, considering Australia is snubbing the U.S. and sidling up to China, the Australian navy also recently staged a dramatic re-enactment of Gen. Douglas MacArthur's Incheon landing during the Korean War, which saved Australian troops from annihilation.
It's strange that the Australians would honor America -- or as the North Koreans put it, try to impress "U.S. sycophants and lackeys" -- just as they're distancing themselves from us. Maybe that's why no one else in the developed world is worried about Australia's joint naval exercises with China.
(But The Weekly World News is jumping right on it!)
In contrast to O'Donnell's manifestly true point that "China could take us over monetarily before they could militarily," Coons seemed more worried about a military invasion. He warned that "as the Chinese have become economically stronger, they are seeking to become militarily stronger."
(O'Donnell quipped: "Are you saying that China has a plot to take over America?" -- exactly what she has been falsely accused of saying.)
Read more at AnnCoulter.Com
If you do nothing else before casting your vote, Delawareans, ask people who know something if China poses more of a military threat, or a monetary threat, to us. (Make sure they know you're talking about China the country, not singer/actress Chynna Phillips.)
Let me know if you'd like to be added to the Ann Coulter ping list.
This article has none of that. It's a purely brilliant review of what actually happened.
Kudos to Ann. Keep it up.
Please, Ann, remove that restraining order!
I hope Delaware voters are smart enough and engaged enough to think for themselves,
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
They’re not.
I think maybe Christine will lose, but you know, it doesn’t matter. We accomplished what we set out to do, and that was to defeat Castle....obviously a man who showed his true colors. Had he supported her, as is the custom when you lose a primary...she would be ahead right now.
Is Sarah going to stump for her? I hope so....
Anyone who doesn’t understand what Christine O’Donnell is saying is much too stupid to be allowed anywhere near the reins of government.
Excellent Ann Coulter! (why haven’t you called lately?)
One experiences this strange phenomena in most conversations with liberals...they so frequently couple loonbat idiocy with arrogance based upon the self deception that they are somehow the smartest person in the room. This is the result of giving every kid a trophy regardless of actual accomplishment.
This is the Great Ann at her great best. I don’t know how any sane human being could vote for a piece of corrupt Marxist slime like Coons. And how could any woman in Delaware or elsewhere not be appalled at this “tactic” of his to roll his eyes and act like every straight-forward fact Christine presents is a hormonal utterance of some kind???
Delaware...ladies...PUH-leez... WAKE UP!
Coons is a little man!
I hope you take the time to catch up before you are lost in the vortex of the wind swirl of the TPM
Be careful, that “irritating”ness could be the onset of a mild case of CES.
LOL and no, that had nothing to do with her leaving "NR(?)"(sic)
Jonah Goldberg didn't like it and she got axed, imo.
Do you agree that this article contains less or none of the 'sardonic wit' you mentioned and yet is one her best ever? Try responding without calling me stupid.
..mild case of CES(?)
What is CES? An example of your 'wit'.
You take yourself too seriously, a side effect of CES.
Look it up, I'm too busy to explain it to you.
Where did I do that?
and you next one is so follow-up in nature...and ridicu-lous
Now that sentence deserves an F. Dosen't pass my spell checker, and why all the ....s. Do you have a problem with the English language?
OK I'm waiting, what's CES, you brought it up, explain your self.
Dare I say it, Coons seems (gasp) ekthtreme.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.