[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Results so far:

No		59%	668 votes	Total: 1133 votes
Yes		41%	465 votes

[A CA Guy]

No, because the action needs to be in the ability to store all this energy for a long term.
Solar is useless and the adjusted gas fuels both pollute the water we drink and blow the engines up over time.

They should work on cheap desalinization.
Someone should come up with a chemical solution to break down nuclear waste to a benign state.

[Uri’el-2012]

We have been subsidizing Solar Energy
for over thirty years.

It is just not profitable nor cost effective.

[TigersEye]

Absolutely not!

[SouthTexas]

Not no, hell no.

Texas leads in the tilting at windmills category and even with the infrastructure paid for, they still cannot produce a reasonably priced product.