Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
Could it be that certain blood types are more or less resistant to the plague.

If blood type O was predominant in the pre-plague era and blood type A was predominant after, could we say that A was selected for via the plague.

Statistically, O is stronger against heart disease and cancer, but weak for anything that came from Pandora's Box. A's die like flies even today, and at younger ages, from cancer and heart disease.

Fox news last night had a mention of the French, who despite their diet had a lot of longevity. France should have been wiped out by plague, but there were pockets that refused outsiders entry. None died. They would still be heavily O’s.

43 posted on 10/21/2010 5:11:29 AM PDT by Battle Axe (Repent, for the coming of the Lord is nigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Battle Axe
Type A+ does dominate Northern and Western Europe doesn't it ~ but the further North you go the longer the expected lifespan with Scanderhoovian wimmin nearly equaling Japanese wimmin!

It's more like a series of diseases, some viral in nature and others bacterial, require some point of attachment on cell surfaces that simply isn't there in some people. This theory has been studied to some degree and the diseases identified. There are people immune to both black plague and cholera, and they appear to be immune to several other quite deadly but common infectious diseases.

Alas, none of the studies have been able to pin down the cause of this immunity (which includes an immunity to AIDs).

44 posted on 10/21/2010 5:19:19 AM PDT by muawiyah ("GIT OUT THE WAY" The Republicans are coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson