Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Piers-the-Ploughman
Maybe not such a bad policy 4000 B.C. But go to Hong Kong or go to Shanghai, China or Mexico City and then make the same statement. I've been to these places and in each case I couldn't wait to leave. Big populations and population density mean crowded conditions, strife, misery, filth, and an eventual loss of personal freedom. I find it amazing that so many cannot grasp this concept.

Look at the States (US) where you have the most personal Freedom and you will see places like Alaska, Wyoming, Montana, etc. Look at the states with the least personal freedom and you will see places like New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, etc. There is a direct relation to personal freedom, quality of life and population density.

Game, Set, and Match.
62 posted on 10/20/2010 11:25:26 AM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: truthguy

Which is why Africa is so free. Oh, wait.

Central African republic, population density = 21 per square mile.

United States of America, population density 72 per square mile.

Quite the opposite. Look at all the densely populated areas, the UK, in the Netherlands. They developed democracy.

As for the US, the least populated area is in the central part of Alaska where most people live on reserve. I wouldn’t exactly call that free.


64 posted on 10/21/2010 1:23:59 PM PDT by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson