To: Tax-chick
I think his point was less on the marketability of the idea than the facade of pretending that “Hooters” is anything less or more than what it is.
50 posted on
10/19/2010 5:34:33 PM PDT by
allmendream
(Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
To: allmendream; CaptainK
I understood the original point; I was just bringing up a related marketing element.
And Chippendales is fringe, nothing like the market presence of Hooters. Women just aren’t that into seeing guys’ dinglebobs.
73 posted on
10/19/2010 5:54:42 PM PDT by
Tax-chick
(I love the smell of napalm in November. Cue the Wagner music ...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson