Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: epithermal
My, my, didn't this one get interesting all of a sudden? My advice to the feds would be to back off while this is still only about wolves. Flooding the Idaho woods with federal agents in order to enforce federal law would not be about wolves.

"The locals are exaggerating, there isn't really a problem" is, after all, what the feds have been telling the citizens of Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas for the last several years. That isn't about wolves either.

31 posted on 10/18/2010 10:16:44 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Billthedrill

I propose a compromise...capture the wolves in Idaho and neighboring states. Transport them and release them near the Arizona border with Mexico...if there are too many wolves, send them to New Mexico and Texas as well. California can fend for itself...


32 posted on 10/19/2010 4:45:35 AM PDT by stefanbatory (Insert witty tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Billthedrill; epithermal
My advice to the feds would be to back off while this is still only about wolves. Flooding the Idaho woods with federal agents in order to enforce federal law would not be about wolves.

Many politic personalities wish to reclaim Idaho's own land, and repeal the 17th Amendment. This should be good :)

33 posted on 10/19/2010 4:49:40 AM PDT by Idabilly (Ye men of valor gather round the banner of the right...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson