Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake
Everyone is aware of it, they admitted the photo was taken through the window. Who else, other than a pedophile would take pictures of a child through the window of their home? That is all the proof that is needed.

Oh yeah, that and the endorsement they just gave, that pretty much nails it down. They got caught.

44 posted on 10/18/2010 7:30:49 AM PDT by McGavin999 ("I was there when we had the numbers, but didn't have the principles"-Jim DeMint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: McGavin999
Everyone is aware of it, they admitted the photo was taken through the window.

They admitted no such thing. They categorically denied it, in fact.

And the Paladino campaign, after being challenged by the Post, provided not a shred of evidence to back up their lie.

Oh yeah, that and the endorsement they just gave, that pretty much nails it down. They got caught.

Let's get this straight: your argument is that if a politician lies about you, and you challenge him to substantiate his lie, and he then completely fails to do so, and you then endorse his opponent - then his lie must be true?

Paladino is the one who got caught making a wild accusation he couldn't back up. And that's not the only time, either.

The guy's an embarrassment.

50 posted on 10/18/2010 7:40:22 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson