To: Chunga85
Chunga85 it's 10:00AM here and no ones posted anything about burning ‘dead beats’ at the stake. Must going to be a quite day here on FR.
4 posted on
10/16/2010 9:15:47 AM PDT by
Kartographer
(".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
To: Kartographer
FSU just pulled ahead of Boston College. 7-6.
Ha! Global meltdown can wait until after sports.
Gotta fling this on during during a commercial break.
More blather from another blogger
I've thought this all along myself. Coming soon - "The United States Department of Absurdities"
ping on/off let me know
6 posted on
10/16/2010 10:14:16 AM PDT by
Chunga85
("Foreclosure Fraud", TARP, "Mortgage Crisis", Bailout)
To: Kartographer
We will see more of these unfold
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/10/msm-distancing-itself-from-bank-party-line-on-foreclosure-crisis.html
The Times has a completely different sort of account, with a headline that is remarkably blunt: Avoid Foreclosure Market Until the Dust Settles. This is the sort of article that gives industry lobbyists nightmares. And with good reason. It contains a horror story that is enough to scare lots of people who are thinking of buying properties out of foreclosure.
Just as the account of a man who had his house foreclosed upon when he has no mortgage persuade a lot of people that there could be real problems with foreclosures, this one illustrates how title has become a mess.
Todd Phelps and Paul Whitehead bought at a foreclosure auction. It turns out the lender who had seized the house was the second mortgage-holder; unbeknownst to them, the property had a large first mortgage outstanding, which meant it was now their obligation.
The buyers had asked their broker to check the records to make sure the title was clear; he appears not to have done so. The auction company would not refund their payment.
But the really nasty bit here is
both loans on the house were from the same bank, Wachovia, now part of Wells Fargo. The Times story does not draw out the implication: first, that the bank foreclosed on a second, rather than a first (is that a weird way to provide a data point to justify not writing all seconds down to zero? And the fact that the buyers were saddled with the first says, in effect, that Wells defrauded the first mortgage holders, presuming, as is likely, that the first mortgage was part of a securitization, as opposed to on Wells books. The proceeds of the foreclosure sale should have gone to the first lien holder, not the second.
The hapless buyers did get out whole; the inquiries of the reporter led Wells to reverse the deal. But anyone in that situation who didnt get a big media outlet shining a bright light on the transaction would have been stuck. Caveat emptor indeed.
8 posted on
10/16/2010 11:57:56 AM PDT by
Fred
(Suspend All Immigration Until Unemployment is Reduced to 5%)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson