Skip to comments.
Benoit Mandelbrot, Mathematician, Dies at 85 (Fractal geometry)
New York Times ^
| October 16, 2010
| JASCHA HOFFMAN
Posted on 10/16/2010 8:13:34 AM PDT by tlb
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: tlb
21
posted on
10/16/2010 11:39:03 AM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
To: InABunkerUnderSF
With regard to the length of coastlines, there can be a limiting value such that as X, the unit of measurement, approaches zero, Y, the length of the coastline approaches a number Z less than infinity.
To: tlb
Yep! His work helped explain why two different sets of xrays showed a different count on the number of fractaled ribs I sustained in an accident.
Fortunately the judge (presiding at the subsequent trial three years later) was familiar with Mandelbrot’s work...
23
posted on
10/16/2010 6:23:57 PM PDT
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
To: tlb
24
posted on
10/17/2010 3:05:29 AM PDT
by
Daffynition
("Life Imitates Bacon, but Bacon does not imitate Life. Bacon IS life." ~paulycy)
To: llevrok
25
posted on
10/17/2010 3:10:40 AM PDT
by
Daffynition
("Life Imitates Bacon, but Bacon does not imitate Life. Bacon IS life." ~paulycy)
To: tlb
26
posted on
10/17/2010 3:19:54 AM PDT
by
dennisw
(- - - -He who does not economize will have to agonize - - - - - Confuscius.)
To: Ramius
You’re right. It takes forever for the rabbit to reach the carrot. But the distance to the carrot is finite. It can be measured. The same is true of the length of a shoreline. We KNOW it can be measured, but if we keep defining it more and more granularly, eventually it becomes infinite.
27
posted on
10/17/2010 8:47:06 AM PDT
by
IronJack
(=)
To: IronJack
There is a subtle difference in the analogy. The distance to the carrot is finite. The distance of the coast is infinite but the area encompassed by the coast is finite. Hence the definition of a fractional dimension or fractal.
To: neverdem; AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...
29
posted on
10/25/2010 8:22:19 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: Ramius
Considering an expanding universe it’s true.
I remember another example, a boy and a girl are on
opposite sides of the room, they half the distance between
them each time, they never touch but are “close enough
for all practical purposes”.
30
posted on
10/25/2010 8:30:02 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
31
posted on
10/25/2010 8:30:38 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson