Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barney Frank haunted by 2003 remarks on lenders ("I was wrong on both counts.")
UPI ^ | 10/14/10

Posted on 10/14/2010 8:39:51 PM PDT by Libloather

Frank haunted by 2003 remarks on lenders
Published: Oct. 14, 2010 at 9:39 PM

BROOKLINE, Mass., Oct. 14 (UPI) - Remarks about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by U.S. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., during a 2003 committee hearing have become a campaign issue in 2010.

Frank said then that the two government enterprises were strong enough to withstand any threats -- and that if they did get into trouble they would not get a government bailout. Sean Bielat, the Republican seeking Frank's seat, has a clip from 2003 on his campaign Web site, "Retire Barney," and Frank has been struggling to explain himself, The Boston Globe reports.

Frank acknowledges what he said in 2003 was "wrong on both counts." He said he was defending Fannie and Freddie because he was afraid the Bush administration wanted to shut them down.

Armando Falcon, who headed the government office in charge of overseeing Fannie and Freddie, reported in early 2003 that both had taken on too much risky debt. Both President Bill Clinton and his successor, George W. Bush, had pushed Fannie and Freddie to expand acquisition of mortgages to expand home ownership.

Bielat calls Frank "one of the leaders of economic disaster" but Peter Morici, a conservative leaning University of Maryland economist, called the mortgage crisis a "bipartisan mess.''


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barney; elections; frank; lenders; obama; palin; remarks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: JimWayne

HOO YAAA!!!


21 posted on 10/14/2010 10:16:07 PM PDT by kennyboy509 (Let us eat cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

It wasn’t just in 2003 - here he is again in 2004:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs


22 posted on 10/14/2010 10:28:42 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Gee Bawarney, at post #9, it looks like something left a bad taste in your mouth!!!!!

What could it have been??


23 posted on 10/14/2010 10:29:20 PM PDT by Noob1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hampdenkid

You can’t see his face from the homo position.


24 posted on 10/14/2010 11:37:58 PM PDT by abigailsmybaby ( I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did. Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

I’m skeptical. It is Masshole after all. Alas, after getting a Republican post Kennedy I just don’t expect lightening to strike twice.


25 posted on 10/14/2010 11:42:31 PM PDT by abigailsmybaby ( I'm not going to buy my kids an encyclopedia. Let them walk to school like I did. Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: econjack
Frank
26 posted on 10/15/2010 2:17:06 AM PDT by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: econjack

The other shoe is the fact that Fannie and Freddie were not included in the financial reform package and we are still on the hook for billions of dollars..A great ad would be wrong then wrong now, cost to the tax payers $BILLIONS$


27 posted on 10/15/2010 2:45:09 AM PDT by carcraft (Pray for our Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne
how can the economy fail?If it gets AIDS.
28 posted on 10/15/2010 2:47:41 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (The Obama magic is <strike>fading</strike>gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

“He said he was defending Fannie and Freddie because he was afraid the Bush administration wanted to shut them down.”

“Both President Bill Clinton and his successor, George W. Bush, had pushed Fannie and Freddie to expand acquisition of mortgages to expand home ownership.”

I’m not sure either of these statements are true. While I remember Pres Bush wanting home ownership for many, I also remember various reports in which he and his administration wanted to reform it and warned about the direction it was headed. He and his admin got slammed by the Dims for the warnings.


29 posted on 10/15/2010 4:20:11 AM PDT by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and protect our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: carcraft
Exactly. But our politicians don't want to fix those institutions because they can use them to buy votes. That's why Fin-Reg doesn't even mention them...the Dems want to demonize business in general and banks in particular.
30 posted on 10/15/2010 5:59:20 AM PDT by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

31 posted on 10/15/2010 1:22:23 PM PDT by WaterBoard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson