As I have stated many times now, and as you are apparently incapable of reading, the courts said common law DEFINES the terms used. It does NOT say we fall under common law.
And it used common law to DEFINE what NBC meant, for 1/3 of the WKA decision.
Do you understand the difference between being UNDER common law, and common law providing the lingua franca for the Constitution?
And it used common law to DEFINE what NBC meant, for 1/3 of the WKA decision.
We get complete Gobbledygook from you.
Gray's 1898 opinion doesn't approach DEFINING Wong Kim Ark as a Natural Born Citizen. The 1874 Supreme Court case of Minor v. Happersett informs us and YOU without a doubt who are natural born citizens and everyone other than born in the country to citizen parents are doubtful...which you willfully ignore.