We are not bound by the laws of England - yet YOU are the one saying Obama is a British subject because of English law.
The courts said the MEANING of legal terms in the Constitution are those found in English common law, since it was the legal language in effect when the Founders were writing. And they thus used the meaning of natural born subject to determine the meaning of natural born citizen.
And the courts specifically rejected Roman law about citizenship.
Again, you don’t get a vote. You don’t have to like it. It is the law. But if you want, feel free to put some skin into the game. Publicly refuse to obey laws signed by Obama because he isn’t REALLY the President. Then, when charges are brought against you, use discovery to get Obama’s birth certificate. Then you’ll be a hero like Lakin...or a prisoner like Lakin, if you lose.
And you will lose, because you ignore the law and substitute your fantasies.
I'm saying it and so are several websites that sprung up to deflect the issue during the election, such as Fightthesmears, etcetera. English law did have a claim upon him at birth, via his father, and likely still does. This makes him less than completely subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, which means he is not a natural-born citizen.