Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
The US Supreme Court has said the meaning is found in common law. Not Vattel, but common law.

... and then went on to cite Vattel nearly verbatim. Clearly, "common law" did not mean English common law. We'd fought wars to separate ourselves from England, you know.

901 posted on 10/17/2010 9:44:20 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 898 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry

No, they went on to deny Vattel’s definition and use the one provided by English common law.


903 posted on 10/17/2010 9:48:45 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 901 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson