Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 23 Everest
No, I don't think so. One could argue that LT. Larkin gave an oath to the Constitution.

He also placed himself under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which takes a dim view of refusing to obey the orders of your superior officers, missing movement, and conduct unbecoming. As Lakin is about to find out.

Unless people like you get jobs as military justices, he should be found Innocent of all charges.

Which would be quite a feat since he's guilty as hell.

89 posted on 10/13/2010 4:59:05 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Hey mo-joe! Here's another one for your collection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

I swear, you would condemn the patriot that stood in front of the tanks in Tinnemen Square.

Don’t you understand the reason for the tea party groups is that we are respectfully, through our election process trying to change government because we don’t believe in Socialism!

This is a pivotal point. People that want Socialism, this is their chance. Those of us against Socialism and for Capitalism, this is are Front. We need to vote the Socialist out of office on both sides of the aisle. Hence the Tea Party.

Back to LT. Larkin. You are wrong. Let me make it simple, it a boyscout gives an oath to do his best and the Scoutmaster says go cut that tree down, would he be guilty for refusing to cut it down?


109 posted on 10/13/2010 5:23:14 PM PDT by 23 Everest (A gun in hand is better than a cop on the phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson