On the contrary, Mr Keyes was acknowledged by the Judiciary as having standing, but his suit(s) were dismissed, mostly for tangential reasons which can be classified under the rubric of "the ruling class closes ranks when the system appears to be under attack".
Wrong again sport. You really have no idea what you're talking about. And insisting that your noise is factual is, as I said more than once so far, Conclusionary nonsense.
Actually, your own link says, “The decision then decides not to decide the question of whether Keyes had standing, and instead rules that even if Keyes does have standing, his suit must fail because it was not filed until after Obama was sworn into office (the judge notes that the case was filed at 3:26 pm Pacific time, January 20, 2009).”
So no, it was not decided that Keyes had standing. Something about only being on the ballot in 3 states makes it tough to win election as President...
BTW - I donated to Keyes campaign when he first ran some years ago. That was before I realized that he is a professional candidate, who runs to make money.