Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
For the purposes of this case, he doesn’t need to prove anything other than that he is accepted by the Congress and the Courts as President.

No, he would have to prove his Constitutional eligibility since that is what Lakin is challenging.

There are Congressmen who believe Guam can tip over, but not one who believes Obama is ineligible because his father wasn’t a US citizen. Not ONE!

First, unless you can provide affadavits from each and every Congressperson attesting to this fact, your claim is nonsense. Second, what they do or don't believe doesn't make Obama eligible or not. The Supreme Court gave us a legal definition in at least two different cases, which I mentioned.

No one is ‘naturalized’ by birth. You are born a citizen, or you are naturalized under laws.

Sorry, but this is pure ignorance. If you are a citizen at birth by virtue of statue or Constitutional amendment, you are 'naturalized' as Congress ONLY has the power of naturalization.

202 posted on 10/13/2010 8:50:36 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

“If you are a citizen at birth by virtue of statue or Constitutional amendment, you are ‘naturalized’ as Congress ONLY has the power of naturalization.”

It is time for your meds. If you are born in the US, you are a US citizen. By birth. NOT by naturalization. By the Constitution, not by Congress. You need to go look up what the word means.


212 posted on 10/13/2010 9:08:52 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson