I think you missed the theme of my post, “professor.”
HINT: It’s in the first paragraph, as follows:
“Let me get this straight:
“Anti-Birthers actually believe that the freckin’(sitting) President of the United States couldn’t get his own “vault” “long form” birth certificate from Hawaii?!!”
The whole point is that anti-birthers are gullible and naive — and YOU certainly were, weren’t you?
Almost every paragraph drives that point home.
At the end I wrap it all up, as follows:
“I can understand differences of opinion as to the definition of “Natural Born Citizen,” — and other constitutional “controversies,” — but that the most powerful man in the world can’t take possession of his own “long form” Birth Certificate because “Hawaii no longer makes them available” is beyond absurd!”
Of course “WE” all now KNOW — because of Danae — that ANYONE can get their “long form” Birth Certificate.
Now please tell us why we should “go to a judge and get a subpoena” when it’s so much more fun to watch the HUSTLER — and his marry band of fools — play, hide the long form!
Have a nice day, “professor”!
STE=Q
YES!
That is IF controlling authorities would attest to it's authenticity... why not?
By the way... don't even TRY to say that the online IMAGE Obama's administration posted on the Internet, was EVER verified as to it's authenticity by the State of Hawaii or ANY other Government agency.
That lie has been debunked... and you know it!
I once PM'd you that I believed you were an honest critic and NOT a Troll -- as everybody claims.
At this point I am leaning toward you being a paid troll.
If you post the aforementioned lie -- or ANY of your other regurgitated crap -- I will consider you a troll.
I once tried to have an edifying discussion with you, but it is apparent that you are not up to the task.
If you want to have a real open discussion, fine.
If you insist on regurgitating material that has been debunked over and over adnasium...?
Now, at this point in time (after two years)I really don't care if the incompetent puppet in the white House "reveals"(in some manner) his "long form," or not.
Frankly, I have serious doubts that he even has one.
Lets say he does post his long form -- although I doubt that will ever happen.
Wouldn't the public ask themselves why did he wait so long to do it?
You imply that we should not trust him even if he were to come out with a "long form" BC.
OK, I'll go there (for the sake of argument)if you like.
Now let me ask you a question:
Do YOU trust him in ANY shape or form?
YES OR NO?
If the answer is "NO" than we have no argument with each other, do we?
If your answer is "YES" then we may have a problem.
Now if your answer is, indeed, yes -- you don't trust the SOB -- let me ask you one more question.
Would YOU like to see him removed from office as soon as possible?
YES or NO?
If the answer is "YES"... then we are practically best buddies!
That only leaves our approach as to how best to get him out of office -- and as soon as possible -- before he can do anymore damage to the country.
You suggest getting a State attorney general and subpoenas and so forth...?
Fine idea(really!)... go for it!
I won't stand in your way.
Others are trying other methods to get rid of the usurper.
Why argue with them?
Your attitude much of the time seems to be a supercilious one.
If you would like to engage in a mutually edifying discussion, -- rather than an exercise in massaging your ego -- fine.
Otherwise, we are wasting each others time.
I hope I've made myself clear.
Have a nice day (or evening as the case may be)
STE=Q