Replies

"But at this point, it is not up to Obama to prove he is President, but for someone else to provide convincing proof that he cannot be President."

Who can be "that someone", when Courts have stonewalled petitioners as having no "Standing" to bring a case? It doesn't bother the Courts that ANY U.S. Citizen who has had this FRAUD perpetrated upon them is ruled to have no dog in this fight.

In reality, any document/legislation/Executive Order, or even orders to military as "Commander-in-Chief" should and would be found to be un-enforceable because they were FRAUDULENTLY applied due to an ineligible FRAUDULENT Office Holder, should such documentation come forward and show non-Natural Born and Constitutionally-ineligible having been the Case. However, due to riots in every inner-city in the USA, backlash from Leftists and the State-Run-Media, the ISSUE of Natural Born Citizen cannot see the light of day, as the Courts will not allow it to be litigated, nor can a convincing re-visiting of the term "subject to the Jurisdiction thereof" in regards to Anchor Babies be argued, either.

(I purposely did not bring up the FACT that the parents of the in-question child were NOT LEGALLY MARRIED, which is another issue that leads to NON-Natural Born Citizen implication, too)

Who can be “that someone”, when Courts have stonewalled petitioners as having no “Standing” to bring a case? It doesn’t bother the Courts that ANY U.S. Citizen who has had this FRAUD perpetrated upon them is ruled to have no dog in this fight.

In reality, any document/legislation/Executive Order, or even orders to military as “Commander-in-Chief” should and would be found to be un-enforceable because they were FRAUDULENTLY applied due to an ineligible FRAUDULENT Office Holder, should such documentation come forward and show non-Natural Born and Constitutionally-ineligible having been the Case. However, due to riots in every inner-city in the USA, backlash from Leftists and the State-Run-Media, the ISSUE of Natural Born Citizen cannot see the light of day, as the Courts will not allow it to be litigated, nor can a convincing re-visiting of the term “subject to the Jurisdiction thereof” in regards to Anchor Babies be argued, either.

(I purposely did not bring up the FACT that the parents of the in-question child were NOT LEGALLY MARRIED, which is another issue that leads to NON-Natural Born Citizen implication, too)

John McCain would have standing to sue, he was DIRECTLY harmed by Obama’s election. Sarah Palin would have standing to sue, she was DIRECTLY harmed by Obama’s election. The Republican National Committee would have standing to sue on behalf of McCain-Palin.

None of those entities has chosen to file suit, enter a suit as a co-plaintiff in a class action or even to file an amicus brief (friend of the court) on behalf of any of the citizens and groups who have challenged Obama’s eligibility in Court.

There are NO issues of standing with a Grand Jury investigation of Obama for election fraud. With a Grand Jury, documents can be subpoenaed and witnesses can be compelled to testify under oath.
If a Grand Jury was good enough for Nixon and Watergate, then why not for Obama?
If a Grand Jury was good enough for the Reagan Administration and Iran-Contra, then why not for Obama?
If a Grand Jury was good enough for Bill and Hillary Clinton and Whitewater, then why not for Obama?
If a Grand Jury was good enough for the Bush administration and CIA Files Leak-Valerie Plame incident, then why not for Obama>
If a Grand Jury was good enough to provide the grounds for the impeachment and removal of Obama’s buddy Rod Blagojevich as Governor of Illinois and to secure a criminal conviction against him, then why not for Obama?

All that is needed is just one prosecuting attorney with the guts to launch a grand jury probe. That prosecuting attorney could be a district attorney, a state attorney general or a US Attorney.

But if there are no guts to take it on as an issue, then there is no possibility of glory.

“In reality, any document/legislation/Executive Order, or even orders to military as “Commander-in-Chief” should and would be found to be un-enforceable because they were FRAUDULENTLY applied due to an ineligible FRAUDULENT Office Holder, should such documentation come forward and show non-Natural Born and Constitutionally-ineligible having been the Case.”

Wrong. The laws Obama signed will still be laws even if he is found tonight to be a space alien.

No one with standing - a legislature, state official, gov, Congressman, etc - has agreed with you. That is the way the law works sometimes. Not everyone can bring a case in court. Nor are all cases appropriate for a court. Deal with it.