If the document is what you say it is, it isn't an original document, but a certified copy of an original document.
A certified copy will have stamped on it the date of issuance, which should be recent.
Hence Loren's question: Where is the date of issuance? Why are you refusing to show it? Could it be because the copy in question wasn't issued in 2010?
Good lord.....
You really can’t fix stupid can you?
Where did I say it was a certified copy? You show me that. It seems to me that it is OBVIOUS that this is NOT a certified copy, and NO WHERE have I said that it is. I was asked by ONAKA himself, if I needed an certified copy or not on Monday Sept 27th. I answered honestly that I did not know. And that is the truth. I didn’t know from the organization I am applying to, if they needed a certified copy or not. Onaka chose to send me an un-certified copy. If that is not sufficient for the organization for which I need it, I will ask yet again and specify that I do need that certified copy. I know exactly who I need to talk to about it as well.
The point being, I was ASKED which one I needed.
What has been posted is a copy made for me by the Hawaii Department of Health. The receipt which shows I paid 10$ for it is ALSO pictured. If you LOOK at the thing notice something different??? Come on pay attention!
Look the bottom of it. The HDOH copy has something that MY copy for the same document does NOT. It has an identification of RACE for both of my parents. The copy made for my by my Mother in 2000 DOES NOT HAVE THAT. Quite literally the copy sent to me by HDOH and mailed Sept 30th 2010, has MORE information on it than any other record I previously have owned.
The date of issuance is the same date as is on the receipt.