Replies

It’s not birthers’ questions about the BC that concern us. (I guess I should speak for myself here and not the entire Sanity Squad.) It’s the “conspiracy group think” that won’t listen to reason. It’s the promotion of con-artists like Orly Taitz and Lucas Smith as patriots. It’s the perpetuation of demonstrably false Internet rumors. It’s the delusional misinterpretations of the law. It’s the insistance that anyone and everyone who disagrees is a paid, Obot troll involved in one giant conspiracy.

To be fair, there are only a few persistent birthers who are guilty of the above. Some of you can have reasonable, polite (if somewhat heated) discussions and walk away in disagreement. There are several birthers with whom I would enjoy a beer and a few laughs. (Although I doubt the feeling is mutual where I am concerned.)

The tin foil EMP thing was poking fun at Orly’s promoters and followers not at birthers who have legitimate questions about the BC.

JimRob warned parsy to stop posting “like a troll.” For a while, we (anti-birthers) believed that JimRob didn’t want any debate on eligibility threads, but that isn’t the case. He allows the debate so freepers can do what they do best - work out the details through a common-sense discussion of the facts. Parsy imposed a “self-zot” in protest of birthers on FR.

Yep, at one point I was an avowed Polarik birther but no more. (The sketchy-looking COLB first released gave me cause to doubt it based on my personal expertise with printed forms.) Do I think Obama’s hiding something regarding his BC? Absolutely. Would I like to see the long-form. Sure. In the scheme of things though, the BC is irrelevant to me and y’all know why.

G’night, joe.

(I guess I should speak for myself here and not the entire Sanity Squad.)

~~~~

What an arrogant and offensive statement, as if ............. ??

I must have missed that authority designation memo.

JimRob is a very engaged, busy man, and he doesn't "allow the debate," he's also been vocal and on the record several times on the issue, expressing concern for the truth, as any other rational FReeper should be, worried for the country and what the real deal is. Is he outside your 'squad?'

###

Re: Obama's birth and qualifications for the presidency Vanity | May 1, 2010 | Jim Robinson
Posted on Saturday, May 01, 2010 3:22:30 PM by Jim Robinson

One of the constitutional requirements for the office of the presidency is that he be a "natural born citizen." This was put into place by the founders to keep foreigners or persons who do not bear a non-questionable allegiance to the US Constitution out. Obviously, and admittedly Barack Hussein Obama was born to a foreign citizen and is not 100% American. He's half-American, half-African and all Marxist. He obviously bears no allegiance whatsoever to the US Constitution and is working overtime to destroy it. He's a usurper and should be removed from office. He is exactly the kind of fraud/usurper the founders feared.

###

Agitators, muckrakers, trolls .. they come and they're gone .. because the stated mission, the heart and soul of this site is conservatism and devotion to our fundamental American ideals and founding principles. And, especially now, with the world aflame and the stability of this country at risk everywhere you look, all hands should be on deck on the #1 conservative internet site, don't you think ?

Folks who believe otherwise eventually reveal their true motives and characters, and are handled.

PS the REAL, official long form birth certificate may not be the end all/be all to one so superior as you, and it may not be, but what else will at least conclusively confirm vital information; i.e., the paternity he touts and birthplace .. or not?