That is my point. Anything goes with regard to what happens to us. They have no boundaries. They have no time limits. Tyranny advances on the back of what the pols want. Wording or procedure does not hold them back. Any and all rationalizations can be used to justify whatever the court does. We simply say “well, they seated Ohio” or “they applied to be a state” in does not matter that their application was never accepted. It does not matter the amendments did not pass they were accepted. It seems like a lot of people on FR simply like it this way.
So all the amendments prior to the 18th that didn’t include time limits should be invalidated?
So all the amendments prior to the 18th that didn’t include time limits should be invalidated?