Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel; Bubba Ho-Tep

“John Jay did not have English common law in mind when he wrote that letter to Washington.”

Of course not. He had in mind a translation of Vattel that would be made 10 years later, right? You’re a mind-reader, and Jay predicted the future...


1,125 posted on 10/18/2010 9:50:22 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1089 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
I don't have to be a mind reader because Jay explicitly says "natural born Citizen" in his letter to the President of the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787.



"John Jay wrote in a letter to George Washington dated 25 Jul 1787:

"Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen. ""



So where does John Jay say "natural born Subject"? No, he does not.

1,130 posted on 10/18/2010 10:06:59 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson