Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pessimist
And of course that’s not the case.

Actually it is. Go look for yourself and you will see that there are rising numbers of property seizures being attempted on people who are either current with their mortgages or who do not owe money on their houses.

What we’re seeing is people searching for technicalities to hold onto property on which they are in default.

If a bank screws up its documentation process and cannot legally seize a property as a result then that is the bank's problem. This version of "the dog ate my homework" excuse did not work in school and it certainly should not be able to work in the real world... especially when those of us who have been on the receiving end of a bank mistake have to spend our time and efforts digging up proof to show that it was indeed the bank that screwed things up.

Yet when lawyers use technicalities against any of their favorite interests, they cry that something needs to be done to rein in the lawyers.

Agreed. But if the law provides for these technicalities and they are not respected by the litigants, then they have no one to blame but themselves for things not going in their favor.

18 posted on 10/13/2010 7:16:06 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: pnh102
Here's more of Karl Denninger on the topic.
21 posted on 10/13/2010 7:25:55 AM PDT by Oberon (Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: pnh102

Agreed.

Technicalities or not, they should be observed.

I disagree with your asessment of the scope of the problem though. Just because the media can find a few people who are wrongly accused doesn’t make for a majority, or even a substantial minority.

I’m sure you’ve seen how whenever someone wants to cut welfare - jsut as an example - the media trots out the rare legitimate sob story to convince people against it.

Bottom line to me is still this (and it’s obviously a genrallization): A lot of people got in way over their heads and think nothing of using any means necessary to avoid that realization.

The whole thing is an ugly situation.


23 posted on 10/13/2010 7:40:08 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: pnh102
I tend to disagree with your assumptions. Of course there will always be fraud in lending on both sides, but the borrower's fraud has far exceeded that of the lenders.

Loans were given to people that didn't even have jobs or flat out lied on their applications. One report I read said there ware approx. 44.4 million mortgages in the US and of that about 9% were underwater. Underwater does not translate into foreclosures. Shutting down the whole process is absurd for the minimal numbers involved here. If there is fraud by the banks, prosecute them.

The fed has already dumped bond holder rights to the auto companies and given the assets to the unions. Contract law is becoming null and void is this country.

Why would anyone loan anything if there is no recourse?

27 posted on 10/13/2010 7:54:15 AM PDT by SouthTexas ("Global Climate Disruption" = More bovine excrement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: pnh102

“Go look for yourself and you will see that there are rising numbers of property seizures being attempted on people who are either current with their mortgages or who do not owe money on their houses.”

I say that is a crock. Got evidence?


32 posted on 10/13/2010 8:02:52 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson