No, ‘you’ succeeded in getting a long time financial and content contributor banned. I come from this from several directions, mostly from fairness. But, I have two daughters who have 5 Iraq tours between them as combat medics and they both think that banning soldiers solely for the reason of sexual preference is morally wrong. I agree. They served with known homosexuals and one of them credits a fellow soldier known to be homosexual from saving her from death or certain serious injury by taking the wheel of their humvee from a panicked SGT during an ambush and driving through direct fire to keep them in contact with the convoy ahead of them. So I guess I am biased for that reason. They also told me of the rampant screwing around on base and numerous pregnancies, alleged rapes, divorces, etc, committed by heterosexual soldiers in their unit. Saying a person who may have a flaw but keeps it to themselves is unworthy of serving when so many disgrace the uniform is hypocritical. I in no way support what I understand to be the ‘homosexual agenda’ and have argued against it always, but in this case I know there have been honorable things done by flawed people and its wrong to condemn them without some consideration we all would need. I created a new account to answer the many responses, but am done with this forum that is apparently too cowardly and hypocritical to debate issues.
I didn’t get you banned, in fact I was sorry you did (assuming you are the banned one).