Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah

So I tolerate that? Not no, but HELL NO! I am for liberty and have said nothing to lead you or anyone else to believe otherwise. I am the only one with that view on this thread, apparently. I said my objection to open homosexuality is that it will create another protected class. I am for honoring the military code across the board, equally and fairly, and am distressed that it isn’t being done now. If that were being done, the issue wouldn’t even exist.


82 posted on 10/12/2010 6:14:03 PM PDT by metalcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: metalcor

You didn’t cite any references supporting your contention that monogamous heterosexual couples are deviant and out of the norm, for one thing.

Second, your slinging the criticism of “bigotry” around when it is not proper use when it applies to deviant mentally ill and dangerous behavior, and your pretense that homosexuals in the military will be fine (except for the special protected class part, which is of course another reason they should not be allowed in) shows me that you are a typical libertarian who can type out slogans but cannot think rationally or be guided by moral absolutes.


83 posted on 10/12/2010 6:21:06 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson