Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US APNewsAlert { Don't ask, Don't tell }
AP via SFGate ^ | 10/12/10

Posted on 10/12/2010 12:44:14 PM PDT by SmithL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
No details yet
1 posted on 10/12/2010 12:44:16 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I am curious why this judge has standing to even think his order would be obeyed.


2 posted on 10/12/2010 12:48:22 PM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Again, the Judge needs to read the Constitution.

Congress regulates the military, not the Judicial Branch.


3 posted on 10/12/2010 12:49:14 PM PDT by Lusis ("Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Phillips, Virginia A.
Born 1957 in Orange, CA

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, Central District of California
Nominated by William J. Clinton on January 26, 1999, to a seat vacated by William M. Byrne, Jr.; Confirmed by the Senate on November 10, 1999, and received commission on November 15, 1999.

U.S. Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, 1995-1999

Education:
University of California, Riverside, B.A., 1979
University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law, J.D., 1982

Professional Career:
Private practice, Riverside, CA, 1982-1991
Commissioner, Riverside Superior Court, CA, 1991-1995

Race or Ethnicity: White

Gender: Female

4 posted on 10/12/2010 12:50:32 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

One... EFFING... judge.

This is why our nation’s days are numbered.


5 posted on 10/12/2010 12:53:00 PM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Excellent! It will be overturned, it’s a Clinton judge, and the timing couldn’t be sweeter!!


6 posted on 10/12/2010 12:55:19 PM PDT by Genoa (Put the kettle on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

“I am curious why this judge has standing to even think his order would be obeyed.”

Because the biggest advances the Left has ever made have been through the courts- it’s a ploy that works, and is permanent, mostly.


7 posted on 10/12/2010 12:55:33 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Great! So let’s go back to the old policy where we ASK them and then kick them out.


8 posted on 10/12/2010 12:57:34 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

‘nationwide injunction stopping enforcement’

WTF

a judge can do this over a military or congressional ruling?

Oh right, so it’s meaningless, except it makes meaningless headlines that stir up Obama’s base...


9 posted on 10/12/2010 12:57:58 PM PDT by Freddd (CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freddd

Stir up Obama’s opponents!!


10 posted on 10/12/2010 12:59:16 PM PDT by Genoa (Put the kettle on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

Agreed - but why THIS judge thinks he can order the EXECUTIVE branch to do something is interesting.


11 posted on 10/12/2010 12:59:47 PM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

Does this mean our troops will now have gays dressed in drag shooting at the Islamist terrorists?


12 posted on 10/12/2010 1:00:15 PM PDT by Freddd (CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Beat me by 5 seconds!! (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2606191/posts)

DAMN my two-figner typnig!!! Can you beleive I do ssytems development for a living, 1 finger at a time?


13 posted on 10/12/2010 1:00:17 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (The TOTUS-Reader: omnipotence at home, impotence abroad (Weekly Standard))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

Buy stock in broken glass!

I hear demand is going way up real soon.


14 posted on 10/12/2010 1:00:49 PM PDT by VanDeKoik (1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

Another judge making an unConstitutional ruling. Only Congress has the Constitutional right to regulate the Armed Forces as per Article 1 Section 8.

15 posted on 10/12/2010 1:00:59 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

They’ve managed to overrule the military when it comes to the treatment of detainees outside the country so now they are trying, like creepers, to spread their tentacles ever wider.


16 posted on 10/12/2010 1:03:43 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Hail Mary Full of Grace, The Lord Is With Thee...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Let me introduce myself. I am Virginia Phillips, and I am the self-anointed expert on how a military should be managed. History, tradition, experience, and respect for those who run the military? I don't need them. You see, I am a lawyer. And not just a regular lawyer, I am a JUDGE.

If you think I am not worthy of the bench, you can attempt to impeach and convict me--otherwise, I will be defining for an entire nation the way they must conduct military personnel policy.

I require total submission, because you see, I wear a BLACK ROBE.

17 posted on 10/12/2010 1:07:16 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The policy seems unConstitutional to me, anyway. Why don’t homosexuals have the same right to serve as anyone else? If their sexual activity becomes an issue and is detrimental to the service, drum them out. I say the same thing for ALL soldiers. It is a dirty little barely secret that a LARGE percentage of females serving in Iraq were sent home pregnant and a LARGE number of men and women committed adultery with other soldiers without any repercussions except for the destroyed families at home. The biggest sellers in the base stores are condoms and pregnancy tests. They have rules against such things, but they ignore those, so why not this one?


18 posted on 10/12/2010 1:07:48 PM PDT by metalcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Our military has always discriminated—
discriminated against the blind, quadriplegics, deaf, mentally ill, etc.
No disrespect to the above.
Just a fact, the military discriminates to maintain the strongest fighting force in the world.
When open homosexuality is permitted, the military may find themselves bogged down with sexual harassment investigations and charges.


19 posted on 10/12/2010 1:08:27 PM PDT by two23 (Liberals Have Created a Culture of Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lusis
Again, the Judge needs to read the Constitution.
Congress regulates the military, not the Judicial Branch.


Aw, that is so old fashioned! Don't you realize the Constitution is a living document ? /heavy sarc
20 posted on 10/12/2010 1:09:12 PM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (A liberal is one who has both feet firmly planted in the air -----Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson