Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeeSac

“#2 is the federal disposal of waste. That has not cost the taxpayers a single penney. “

Correct me if I am wrong, but $10 billion in tax dollars has been spent on the characterization of Yucca Mountain, before that idiot Reid killed it.

I am all for nukes and say build, build build. But, I would like to see the industry stand on its own economically. I believe there will come a time when the economics will look very good for nukes. I spent many years in the oil exploration business and I do believe in peak oil.


9 posted on 10/12/2010 9:12:30 AM PDT by epithermal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: epithermal
Correct me if I am wrong, but $10 billion in tax dollars has been spent on the characterization of Yucca Mountain, before that idiot Reid killed it.

Your statement is wrong. The Nuclear Waste Policy Act established a fund which was paid for by a tax on every kwhr of nuclear-generated electricity. It was paid for by consumers, not taxpayer dollars.

11 posted on 10/12/2010 9:18:02 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: epithermal

We need to start reprocessing the waste rather than just storing it.


14 posted on 10/12/2010 10:06:14 AM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: epithermal
Correct me if I am wrong, but $10 billion in tax dollars has been spent on the characterization of Yucca Mountain, before that idiot Reid killed it.

You stand corrected.

15 posted on 10/12/2010 10:15:32 AM PDT by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson