Oh, I see, so you've actually SEEN his LFBC to make these statements, have you? This is the problem with this whole BC controversy....no one knows what is fact or fiction anymore, and no one has documented proof of anything.
I say PROOVE IT! At the very minimum preclude you statements with the proviso, "IMHO", or "My uninformed guess is", or "I think", etc. Speculation as fact is a sure way to sink this important issue and you are not being helpful.
Nice overreaction. You did notice the word “IF” at the beginning of my previous post?? I’m going by what the best avialable evidence tells us. We have evidence Granny and SAD (not Barak Sr.) lived at the address listed in the newspaper birth announcement, and that SAD was in Washington state the same month the baby was born. The HI DOH has admitted through responses to UIPA requests that Obama’s birth records were amended, meaning the original birth records DO NOT prove Obama was born in Hawaii. The law allows unattended births to be registered by anyone with knowledge of the birth. All this explains why Obama doesn’t want to show the LFBC. It would call into question the veracity of the claim of Hawaiian nativity. It also explains why the DOH doesn’t want to release the LFBC, yet still claims other vital records verify his birth in Hawaii (which are probably supplementary records filed later with the state). It would also explain how the birth announcements were placed in the newspapers in 1961. Feel free to provide an alternate explanation.