Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strategerist

This assumes underground aquifers are static and they aren’t. For example, the panhandle of Idaho sits atop a huge aquifer. You will find there the Lost River, and if memory serves, the Little Lost River. They are “lost” because the water in them eventually sinks into the aquifer. A lot of it emerges later near Twin Falls, Idaho but it is clear that aquifers are not closed off “water banks” from which there are only withdrawals, not deposits.


23 posted on 10/09/2010 8:26:50 AM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: caseinpoint
"They are “lost” because the water in them eventually sinks into the aquifer."

I believe it's the other way around. Rivers flow long after runoff ceases because water flows out of the aquifer into the river.

If a river 'sinks into the aquifer', what is really happening is that the water table in the aquifer drops below the riverbed.

32 posted on 10/09/2010 8:42:14 AM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson