Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the GOP missing a golden opportunity with this issue? (Vanity)
October 8, 2010 | no dems

Posted on 10/08/2010 8:50:27 AM PDT by no dems

Why has the GOP not made a big stink over the fact that the Democratic controlled Congress, for the first time in many years, did not give Social Security recipients a COLA raise in 2010? Huh? That should be a major campaign issue this year.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: issue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
We've still got 25 days to hang this around the neck of the Dems.
1 posted on 10/08/2010 8:50:35 AM PDT by no dems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: no dems

There probably will be no COLA in 2011 either. Thank the muslim who 45% of people over 60 voted for.


2 posted on 10/08/2010 8:53:33 AM PDT by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Why has the GOP not made a big stink over the fact that the Democratic controlled Congress, for the first time in many years, did not give Social Security recipients a COLA raise in 2010?

**************************************************************

Because SS is nearly bankrupt and the GOP should oppose all automatic budget increases no matter who’s pig’s getting fed.


3 posted on 10/08/2010 8:53:43 AM PDT by pgkdan (Protect and Defend America! End the practice of islam on our shores before it's too late!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

The GOP should not touch this issue. Clamoring for a COLA will only explode the deficit and long term debt. A major problem with Social Security and federal pensions is the ridiculous COLA.


4 posted on 10/08/2010 8:53:46 AM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Ummmm...

You’re suggesting that the Republicans beat on the Dims for *NOT* spending money??


5 posted on 10/08/2010 8:53:50 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

um... because we supported it?


6 posted on 10/08/2010 8:53:52 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

There are a lot of issues to hang around their necks.
I agree with Rush. It is fun to sit back and watch them implode.


7 posted on 10/08/2010 8:54:35 AM PDT by TexasPatriot1 (Annoy a lib, get a job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Maybe because the costs of living has declined. Actually, they didn’t get one in 2009 for the same reason.


8 posted on 10/08/2010 8:55:21 AM PDT by NavVet ("You Lie!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Beseme’ Cola...


9 posted on 10/08/2010 8:55:30 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

It’s a good political brickbat, but there are many problems with it.

Wrong is wrong.

Socialism is socialism.

Unfunded mandates are unfunded mandates.

The money just isn’t there.

There’s a zillion reasons. Ultimately, SS needs to be phased out. Morally, those currently or imminently on SS need to have the promises made to them kept. For the rest of us: ideally, the government would give us our money back. But it’s been spent.

A fine kettle of fish.


10 posted on 10/08/2010 8:56:42 AM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Because the GOP is suppose to be the party of limited governement (spending included) and not the party of ever increasing entitlements?


11 posted on 10/08/2010 8:56:53 AM PDT by Padams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavVet

” Maybe because the costs of living has declined. “

Been to the grocery store, lately??

The *Government* statistic (CPI) may have ‘declined’, but what it actually *costs* for a real person to live is going the opposite way.....


12 posted on 10/08/2010 8:58:17 AM PDT by Uncle Ike (Rope is cheap, and there are lots of trees...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: no dems

I’m more concerned that Congress did not pass a budget, passed a continuing resolution that maintains a 28% increase in spending, and has done absolutely nothing to address the horrendous unemployment across the Country.

Foregoing a cost of living increase for Social Security is not high on anyone’s list that I know of; not to say those folks aren’t out there.


13 posted on 10/08/2010 8:58:22 AM PDT by Bean Counter (Now what kind of a geroo are you anyway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

This is an excellent point. Hopefully individual House candidates are making this point in their respective districts.


14 posted on 10/08/2010 9:00:04 AM PDT by MissesBush (Stay angry--right through November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

Why would it be RIGHT to complain Democrats didn’t give a raise to a system that is on it’s way to bankrupting America anyway?

I prefer substance over sound bites.


15 posted on 10/08/2010 9:03:53 AM PDT by macquire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush

So you prefer false attacks over substance?

Isn’t that what the liberals do?


16 posted on 10/08/2010 9:04:45 AM PDT by macquire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike
” Maybe because the costs of living has declined. “

I pay more for a gallon of milk than for a gallon of gas........

17 posted on 10/08/2010 9:10:32 AM PDT by sniper63 (I am the leader of the TEA Party, I, myself am the leader of me, myself for I am the TEA Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: no dems

It never fails to amaze me how many various issues the republicans could use to hit the dems over the head with and yet year after year they miss the opportunities.


18 posted on 10/08/2010 9:13:39 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissesBush; All
This is an excellent point. Hopefully individual House candidates are making this point in their respective districts

Thank you MissessBush. Folks, I'm all for reigning in spending but SS has always been the sacred cow in American Politics. The Stimulus money that, just this week, was reported going to dead people and prison inmates, would have covered a nice COLA for the old folks. Just seems that we could beat the Dems at their own little nasty game of playing the "Piss Off the Old Voters" card since the Dems control Congress. Old People Vote!!!
19 posted on 10/08/2010 9:14:37 AM PDT by no dems (DeMINT / PALIN 2012 or PALIN / DeMINT 2012.......Either is fine with me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Why has the GOP not made a big stink over the fact that the Democratic controlled Congress, for the first time in many years, did not give Social Security recipients a COLA raise in 2010? Huh? That should be a major campaign issue this year.

Because Congress doesn't control COLA. It's calculated automatically and applied automatically and no COLA was authorized.

20 posted on 10/08/2010 9:15:31 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Hey mo-joe! Here's another one for your collection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson