Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: abb; Fee

What about the “larger societal” implications of allowing the banks to get away with committing crimes and destroying property ownership laws?

Is that significant?


28 posted on 10/08/2010 4:09:28 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver; Fee

There is no “property ownership” until the mortgage is paid in full. Somehow, the debate has been shifted to the point that occupation of property equals equity.

Ain’t so.

99 and 44/100 percent of these issues would be headed off if the borrower merely adheres to the terms of the contract. That is to say if you pay your debts, there are no problems.


39 posted on 10/08/2010 4:50:09 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: driftdiver

that is an excellent point.


145 posted on 10/08/2010 8:34:49 AM PDT by ChurtleDawg (voting only encourages them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson