Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dennisw
Now, I can only speak to the 100 or so foreclosure cases I have personally read the complaints on in Florida and a few in Ohio. In 100% of these foreclosure cases, the suit is being brought NOT by the Trust but by the servicer or the trustee. Both of these entities are agents for the Trust but they are NOT the owners of these Notes

I would have though that bringing the foreclosure suit as the agent for the Note Owner would be straight forward, with the only problem being showing that the servicing agreement included the ability to act for the owner in this fashion.

19 posted on 10/08/2010 3:25:52 AM PDT by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Fraxinus
I would have though that bringing the foreclosure suit as the agent for the Note Owner would be straight forward, with the only problem being showing that the servicing agreement included the ability to act for the owner in this fashion.

The author also says the original note must be presented in foreclosure court proceedings. Not a copy of it. His experience is that the go go years of mortgage securitization were so sloppy that the original note usually cannot be produced in court

29 posted on 10/08/2010 4:23:28 AM PDT by dennisw (- - - -He who does not economize will have to agonize - - - - - Confuscius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson