Take it to SCOTUS they’ll overturn the Detroit Dweeb.
How many people screamed, if for no other reason, zero would appoint up to three supers ?
But no ... like answering the card swipe question, "Is $132.55 OK?" ... too many voters punched "Yes"
4 will
4 wont
1 will....well he will be what he is..the swing vote
The SCOTUS can no longer be depended on to rule on constitutionality. Barring that, look at how long it took for McCain/Feingold to wind its way through the system before it was presented to the SCOTUS. This is a very bad sign. Waiting for Virginia's ruling (Landmark is involved in it (Mark Levin)
Can one of the brilliant freepers here explain what happens when judges in different areas rule in complete opposition to one another?
“Take it to SCOTUS theyll overturn the Detroit Dweeb.”
Don’t be so sure. When W Bush signed the Campaign Finance Bill (or something like that) he assumed the Supremes would strike it down. But he signed it to keep McCain and the media off his back.
I think you know the rest of the stroy. And that was before Sotomeyer and Kagan.