Skip to comments.
U.S. Army Upgrades To .300 Winchester Magnum
StrategyPage.com ^
| October 07, 2010
Posted on 10/07/2010 9:55:41 AM PDT by Neil E. Wright
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: AzSteven
a new scopeAh. There's half the cost right there.
Good glass, tuned for that round, ain't cheap.
21
posted on
10/07/2010 10:16:29 AM PDT
by
IYAS9YAS
(Liberalism can be summed up thusly: someone craps their pants and we all have to wear diapers)
To: Neil E. Wright
Shortly before he died, Jeff Cooper wrote that the next big challenge for shooters and gunmakers would be the "20-20-20" - that is, putting 20 rounds in a 20" circle at 1,000 yards in 20 seconds or less. I always thought the optimum rifle to do it would be this little gem from Walther, also a .300 WinMag sniper rifle...
22
posted on
10/07/2010 10:17:27 AM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Neil E. Wright
Looks to me like we are keeping the scope mounts (maybe) and replacing everything else (lock, stock and barrel) for $7800.00. What a crock.
To: Bigun
I know a custom rifle maker who will make you a one of a kind, accurized (guaranteed to shoot 1/2 minute groups w/ good ammo), personalized, .300 Win mag for $3500.00 all day long!Does that include the scope? Some of what our troops are using is very high-dollar stuff, scope-wise.
24
posted on
10/07/2010 10:18:50 AM PDT
by
IYAS9YAS
(Liberalism can be summed up thusly: someone craps their pants and we all have to wear diapers)
To: Neil E. Wright
I'm looking at Lee's "Modern Reloading", comparing .308 Winchester to .300 Winchester Magnum for a 250-grain jacketed bullet...
...and becoming seriously aroused.
To: Neil E. Wright
The 98Bravo would be better:
26
posted on
10/07/2010 10:21:13 AM PDT
by
SVTCobra03
(You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
To: IYAS9YAS
Nope!
Scope would be extra but mounts are included.
27
posted on
10/07/2010 10:21:26 AM PDT
by
Bigun
("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
To: Bigun
The conversion kit includes a new receiver and barrel, a new scope, a new flash suppressor and a folding buttstock.
28
posted on
10/07/2010 10:26:42 AM PDT
by
MileHi
( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
To: The Sons of Liberty
I was gonna say, I didn’t pay even half that for my .300 Win Mag with the stock mod, barrel mod, the trigger job, the scope or all the ammunition...
29
posted on
10/07/2010 10:28:10 AM PDT
by
WAW
(Which enumerated power?)
To: Parley Baer
Holy smokes.....
Surely they could just buy new rifles. For less than half that price!!
To: Parley Baer
Holy smokes.....
Surely they could just buy new rifles. For less than half that price!!
To: Neil E. Wright
I havea hard time believing taht they cannot buy NEW ones for less than $7800/each!! Here we go with the $5500 toilet seats again.
32
posted on
10/07/2010 10:40:31 AM PDT
by
my small voice
(A biased media and an uneducated public is the biggest threat to our democracy)
To: Neil E. Wright
Hell, we need to tell them about Walmart. 300 mags are on sale for $289!!!!!!!
33
posted on
10/07/2010 10:41:30 AM PDT
by
my small voice
(A biased media and an uneducated public is the biggest threat to our democracy)
To: WAW
The .338 Lapua is a quite a weapon. The Brits first choice, and they are good with it. Fires a 250 gr bullet @ 2900 or so. Their new rifles are $7000?
Remington makes one that goes for about $1300. Remington or any of the US MFGs are hard to beat.
The cheap way out is the .338 Win Mag. Superbly accurate, slightly less powerful, it will blow the lungs out of moose @600 yds. If you like Cheaperthandirt.com, check out their Zastava bolt action in .338 winmag @ about $500 or so....
To: 300winmag
Ping - how about this one? OB
35
posted on
10/07/2010 10:50:03 AM PDT
by
LSAggie
To: Neil E. Wright
To: Parley Baer
What a tremendous waste of taxpayer’s money! The new Savage Arms 110 BA in .338 Lapua will shoot rings around the .300 Winchester for thousands less per rifle. IMHO of course :)
37
posted on
10/07/2010 11:03:59 AM PDT
by
Big_Harry
( Starve the Beast!)
To: Neil E. Wright
Good Luck! I fired a .300 Wichester Magnum for the first time last weekend, and my shoulder is still feeling the punch. I will stick to my .308, thank you.
38
posted on
10/07/2010 11:07:21 AM PDT
by
broken_arrow1
(I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
To: Neil E. Wright
Sounds like more of the same old, same old political wheeling and dealing that caused us to spend billions on equipping our forces with .223 poodle shooters.
It always seems that one of the top priorities on any weapons procuement contract is to make certain the right amount of money is spent with the right people.
39
posted on
10/07/2010 11:11:43 AM PDT
by
Iron Munro
(I prayed: "O Lord make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it - He sent the Obamas.)
To: broken_arrow1
I love my savage 300 win mag. Will admit, a few boxes will put a definite hurt on you first time you fire one for sure.
40
posted on
10/07/2010 11:23:44 AM PDT
by
Mouton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson