Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kimberly GG
IF he actually said this, he’s lost my vote.

He DID say it. Later he said he should never have made public his private thoughts.

What I want to know is what he thinks about "sexually active MALE teachers". Can they be sexually active, but not females?

42 posted on 10/06/2010 8:09:29 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: BunnySlippers

He said single pregnant teachers.


44 posted on 10/06/2010 8:10:59 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: BunnySlippers
What I want to know is what he thinks about "sexually active MALE teachers". Can they be sexually active, but not females?

Well, obviously, that's a completely different question - a horse of a different color. I should think he would see the difference.

45 posted on 10/06/2010 8:12:45 PM PDT by Walts Ice Pick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: BunnySlippers

Which is an important distinction. I may well wish that teachers were of good moral character, without looking for a law to enforce my idea of morality.

I certainly wish teachers would keep quiet about their sexuality, and I’d rather women and men only have sex when married, so children have a biological mother and father. But that doesn’t mean I would support firing a teacher if she got pregnant ou of wedlock, or had decided to live with a man without getting married. Bad choices, but not something I’d want a law about.


83 posted on 10/07/2010 7:21:47 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson