Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressman: Google-Searched Federal Audit on Obama Abortion Push in Kenya “Embarrassing”
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | October 6, 2010 | By Peter J. Smith

Posted on 10/06/2010 12:27:52 PM PDT by topher

Wednesday October 6, 2010


Congressman: Google-Searched Federal Audit on Obama Abortion Push in Kenya “Embarrassing”

By Peter J. Smith

WASHINGTON, D.C., October 6, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Pro-life U.S. Congressman Chris Smith of New Jersey this week blasted a just-released report commissioned by USAID’s inspector general (IG) on the Obama administration’s involvement in Kenya’s abortion-promoting constitution as “poorly researched,” “embarrassing,” and  “a whitewash.”

Smith, who is the ranking U.S. congressman on the House of Representative’s Africa panel and co-chair of the Congressional Pro-life Caucus, had asked U.S. Agency for International Development’s IG Donald Gambatesa for a detailed report into allegations that the Obama State Department and USAID were illegally funding groups pushing for a “yes” vote on Kenya’s pro-abortion constitution.

Under U.S. statute known as the Siljander amendment, U.S. funds are forbidden to go to overseas “lobbying for or against abortion” in other countries. 

Kenya’s since-passed constitution significantly changes abortion law from the previous document. It permits abortion for the sake of the "health" of the mother - a term that opponents of unborn rights admit can be "broadly interpreted when need be" to help bring about abortion on demand.

The constitution was adopted by approximately 70 percent of voters in August. 

The New Jersey Republican said he received the IG’s report late Friday and was astonished at what was clearly a “whitewash” investigation.

“This was not a well-researched investigation. We had expected the truth and nothing else,” said Smith. “We had hoped the IG would dig deep for the facts. This is the most superficial report I’ve seen in my 30 years in Congress.”

According to the USAID IG, the Obama Administration poured $61.2 million into Kenya, which was given to eight prime recipients and 86 sub-recipients. $12.6 million was specifically related to the constitution reform process.
 
Although Gambatesa said he “did find evidence that USAID” had spent taxpayer funds to “achieve a yes vote” — an act Smith contends is illegal under Siljander because the new Kenyan constitution changes abortion policy — the IG said his office did not find any evidence of “direct lobbying.”

However, Smith and other concerned pro-life Congressman say that there is plenty of evidence that the federal government was waging a “yes” campaign in Kenya through proxy groups – a number of them pro-abortion non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

Smith said the IG told him that his office conducted interviews and Internet searches of some of USAID’s lobbying grantees and found “the organizations listed above indicated that they do not have a position with respect to abortion.”

However, the response was a “credibility-buster” for the congressman, as several organizations (e.g. the Federation of Women Lawyers Kenya (FIDA-Kenya), African Woman and Child Feature Service, Women in Law and Development in Africa) are organizations that are well known to promote abortion in Kenya.

All three groups petitioned the Kenyan Parliament to advocate for proposed provisions in the draft constitution that would liberalize Kenya’s abortion laws, and all three groups received tens of thousands of dollars in U.S. federal money allocated to the Kenya referendum effort. 

“With this poorly researched, incomplete audit, we still don’t know” the federal government’s full involvement, Smith said.
 
When he received a preliminary report from Gambatesa in June, Smith said he was shocked to learn that the IG’s investigator had performed a “Google search” to find NGOs positions on abortion. According to Smith, Gambatesa admitted that this was “embarrassing” after the IG was showed evidence from major media outlets confirming the NGOs well-established activities promoting abortion.

 “This final audit is a major embarrassment as well,” Smith said.


See previous coverage by LifeSiteNews.com:

Obama Congratulates Kenya for Passing Obama-Backed Constitution
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/aug/10080601.html

Bribed, Intimidated Kenyan Voters Approve Pro-Abortion Constitution
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/aug/10080506.html

Biden Promises Kenya 'Money to Flow' if Pro-Abort Constitution Passes
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/jun/10061804.html

Feds Hand $23 Million to Kenya Proxies Fighting for Pro-Abortion Constitution
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/jul/10071910.html  

URL: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/oct/10100604.html


Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; impeachment; prolife; siljander
Obama Administration violating the Siljander Amendment?

If we get two thirds of the House, there should be an impeachment trial started. It may not go anywhere in the Senate, but it will make a point...

The United States should not be:

(1) Using Taxpayer funds to promote abortion in other countries

(2) The Administration should abide by the laws of the United States.

1 posted on 10/06/2010 12:27:53 PM PDT by topher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: topher
Biden Promises Kenya 'Money to Flow' if Pro-Abort Constitution Passes

This is signature liberal advocacy procedure, they've been doing this in the States for over 50 years.

James Q. Wilson, the conservative political essayist, described over 40 years ago, in a paper on municipal government, how liberals bribed local governments and individual politicians to follow liberal policy nostrums and ignore their constituents, by using foundation grants to supply program and political dollars "at the margin". This "marginal", revocable nature of the grants is what persuaded the pols to gee and haw to the liberals on the grantor boards.

Then Lyndon Johnson started using federal moneys the same way, with massive grants guaranteed to get compliance, howbeit with doubtful constitutionality.

In this new case, the liberals were lying walking in the door. There was no way they didn't know that the moneys were going to be used exactly this way, to provide abortion services -- one of the holy-grail nostrums of all liberaldom.

2 posted on 10/07/2010 6:40:44 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson