Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Taking a page from her hero Obama's work ethic, there's just so much work and the caseload is intense. So many conflicts and the solicitor general's job, too.

Cry me a river. She isn't qualified and we should be praying to protect America from her and her votes.

1 posted on 10/04/2010 10:54:23 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CincyRichieRich

If only she could be recused all the way to retirement.


2 posted on 10/04/2010 10:57:42 AM PDT by WAW (Which enumerated power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

Recusing herself from anything to do with a legal analysis is the thing to do.

She’s got about as much talent in that field as she would in physics.

She’s a bimbo.

Period.


3 posted on 10/04/2010 11:04:40 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

Considering she has forty years on the court, one year really won’t matter in the big scheme of things...../sarc.


5 posted on 10/04/2010 11:05:51 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich
Taking a page from her hero Obama's work ethic, there's just so much work and the caseload is intense. So many conflicts and the solicitor general's job, too.

When judges move from the Department of Justice to a court, the rules of judicial ethics require them to recuse (disqualify) themself in any case they worked on as a government lawyer. Rehnquist was recused from many cases during his first term on the Court, for the same reason. By next term, this won't be an issue.

There are many things to criticize Kagan for, but this isn't one of them; she is following the law.

6 posted on 10/04/2010 11:51:24 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich

Voting “present” and then leaving...


8 posted on 10/04/2010 11:55:46 AM PDT by Bookwoman ("...and I am unanimous in this...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Can anyone possibly believe that George Bush would have been able to get a nominee to the bench who would have to recuse themselves repeatedly because of “bias” for arguing for Bush’s viewpoint on numerous cases?

But I’m told there is no bias in the media


10 posted on 10/04/2010 11:57:51 AM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich
Well, someone figured out why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court.... Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama. She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard.

Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket: You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?? Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!!! Check out these examples:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/08-10382.htm

11 posted on 10/04/2010 12:00:04 PM PDT by True Grit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich
With regard to Kagan's recusing herself:

Lefty Senator Patrick Leahy is trying to “remedy” this “problem”, according to an editorial in the WSJ today.

Leahy is apparently going to propose legislation - as if Congress can “legislate” SCOTUS appointments - that would place a retired SCOTUS justice temporarily back on the bench to participate in a case where a sitting justice recused themselves.

Of course the conniving Leahy is explaining his proposal as the "benevolent" motive of seeking to avoid 4-4 tie votes.

Yea right!!!.

13 posted on 10/04/2010 1:31:00 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CincyRichieRich; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


14 posted on 10/04/2010 3:22:19 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson