Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clint N. Suhks

I watched the episode and thought it was, for the most part, rather unfunny.

However, I’m confused as to why Limbaugh even considered working with someone like McFarlane.

It seemed as if his purpose was to validate every stereotype that the Left has for Conservatives. And his hit on Schiavo was particularly tasteless. If it was satire, it was completely lost on me.

Someone once said that Limbaugh was a masterful entertainer and being a Conservative was just his “schtick.” You have a ready-made partisan audience that needs very little encouragement to tune in. All you need to do is to package it in a glossy wrapper.

He seems to have proven that theory correct.


72 posted on 10/04/2010 6:11:26 PM PDT by MDspinboyredux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: MDspinboyredux
It seemed as if his purpose was to validate every stereotype that the Left has for Conservatives

Yes it did but I think Rush was trying to break through the "conservative" glass ceiling in Hollyweird. Epic Fail! He ignored the timing so close to the elections and reinforced conservative stereotypes. I was very disappointed.

73 posted on 10/04/2010 8:30:23 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (Proud Anti-Establishment Extremist. No more 0bama Republicans! (Palin/Cheney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson