What do you have in mind? Because Darwin's central ideas were natural selection and common descent. And genomics (the sequencing and study of genomes) has certainly provided massive new evidence confirming common descent.
Absent common descent, for instance, nothing about the study described in this article would make any sense, and the result wouldn't even have been possible.
BTW, fossil virsus have also been found in the same positions in the DNA of humans and apes. And, as in the present study, they fit the necessary patterns of common descent (e.g. if present in humans and gorillas, must also be present in chimps; if present in orangutans and humans, must also be present in gorillas and chimps; etc).
Given that the particular place in the genome into which a virsus inserts itself is random, and that genomes are absurdly (haystack versus needle) massive compared to viruses, how do you explain, apart from common descent, how different species end up with the same fossil viruses in the same places in their DNA?
So when you go through the fossil record and find avian influenza infecting men, that means that men evolved from birds?
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe · |
|||
Antiquity Journal & archive Archaeologica Archaeology Archaeology Channel BAR Bronze Age Forum Discover Dogpile Eurekalert LiveScience Mirabilis.ca Nat Geographic PhysOrg Science Daily Science News Texas AM Yahoo Excerpt, or Link only? |
|
||
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword · |