Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Expands IRS Form 1099 Reporting Requirement to Include All Rental Property Owners
CNSNEWS.COM ^ | 9/28/2010 | Chris Neefus

Posted on 09/30/2010 12:46:14 PM PDT by bbernard

(CNSNews.com) – Millions of Americans who own rental property are in for a bit of a rude awakening, beginning in January.

Congress has presented a bill to President Obama that would expand the IRS Form 1099 reporting requirements set out in the health-care reform law to include private citizens who own rental property.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, President Obama’s health care law, requires that small businesses file a Form 1099-MISC with the IRS for any goods they purchase from an outside vendor valued at over $600.

But the new bill, the Small Business Jobs and Credit Act (H.R. 5297), extends the mandate to private individuals who own property from which they receive rental income. Those people would also now have to fill out paperwork reporting any expenditure they make on that property valued over $600 for the year.

Section 2101 of the bill accomplishes this by considering anyone receiving rental income as “engaged in a trade or business.”

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1099
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: CPT Clay
I will not comply

Trust me, You will not be alone!

61 posted on 09/30/2010 1:34:56 PM PDT by JDoutrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bbernard

We simply need to abolish the federal government. It has overgrown its purpose and usefulness.


62 posted on 09/30/2010 1:35:03 PM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

The electronic filing is just the A copy. You still have to stuff the B copy in an envelope and mail it to the recipient. Keep the C copy on file for at least 3 years”

We do all that mailing now. Like I say, it is less than 10 usually.

With the new rules, if my Maytag dealer sells a washer or dryer & has to send a 1099 to each customer, that will put us above 250.

I will have to stop doing his bookkeeping or there will have to be a service that comes into this chain of disaster that will prepare the data in the form the Feds will accept.

I surely cannot spend any serious amount of money to create fancy ‘electronic’ forms when the whole annual value of what I do for him is rarely above $600 even to me.


63 posted on 09/30/2010 1:37:06 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg

Good point.


64 posted on 09/30/2010 1:41:18 PM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: bbernard

they’re not doon’ it raht....what part of RE PEAL do they NOT understand about this provision....


65 posted on 09/30/2010 1:41:31 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

From my reading of the health care bill, it is at least mostly true. I cannot remember all the details beyond the health care plan payment by the company is now taxable income.


66 posted on 09/30/2010 1:41:58 PM PDT by Ingtar (If Washington and his peers had been RINOs, we would still be a British colony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
there will have to be a service that comes into this chain of disaster that will prepare the data in the form the Feds will accept.

I've been exploring the idea of starting such a service. But with the uncertainty of whether or not the new 1099 law will be repealed, it's not worth the business risk.

67 posted on 09/30/2010 1:42:00 PM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: bbernard

JURY NULLIFICATION


68 posted on 09/30/2010 1:44:17 PM PDT by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

I think it was in the financial non-reform bill, actually. Banks are required to submit all transactions now.


69 posted on 09/30/2010 1:45:06 PM PDT by Ingtar (If Washington and his peers had been RINOs, we would still be a British colony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal

“This way landlords are sending 1099s to Home Depot, the utility company and the mortgage company. This is ridiculous.”

What better way to justify post office budget increases?


70 posted on 09/30/2010 1:46:56 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Political correctness in America today is a Rip Van Winkle acid trip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

“In the health care bill, all your credit card transactions will be reported to the federal govt. The federal govt will share this with the states and you will all receive an itemized listing of all the out of state purchases you made and a bill for the use/sales tax you didn’t pay. States have been wanting this information for a long time, now they got it and you get a bill.”

This is news to me. I wouldn’t be surprised, though.
Would that be for this year or next? Do you have a link or some such that explains this?


71 posted on 09/30/2010 1:49:23 PM PDT by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gideon7

Well it does not look like a roll-your-own for a script kiddie.


72 posted on 09/30/2010 2:06:18 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

One would reply with an accounting of such purchases as they would be taxed under the tax code, with such supporting information as web merchant confirmation emails, screen shots, packing receipts, etc. to account for the credit card transactions the state is pointing at. Enough people do that and state tax departments will be snowed under.


73 posted on 09/30/2010 2:10:11 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: bbernard

So lemme get this straight. So rather than remove the onerous 1099 requirement on small business, these Demoncrats are actually expanding it? Are they TRYING to lose in November?


74 posted on 09/30/2010 2:12:58 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (There is no "common good" which minimizes or sacrifices the individual. --Walter Scott Hudson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Well, advertising mail is supposedly the USPS’s biggest cash cow. But I can’t seem them complaining about a burst of first class mail, paid at first class postage rates.


75 posted on 09/30/2010 2:14:00 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

The Bummer can do anything to get rainbow riding unicorns to poop skittles out of the sky.


76 posted on 09/30/2010 2:14:52 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret
(Sec. 9013) Increases the adjusted gross income threshold for claiming the itemized deduction for medical expenses from 7.5% to 10% beginning after 2012. Retains the 7.5% threshold through 2016 for individual taxpayers who have attained age 65 before the close of an applicable taxable year.

Raising the taxes on the middle class through the back door. So if you make $100K now you can deduct medical expenses above $7K. Thanks to Obama it is now $10K.

77 posted on 09/30/2010 2:17:42 PM PDT by keepitreal ( Good manners never go out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bbernard

Don’t forget the 3.8% tax on passive income. If you do not actively manage your rental property it is considered passive income (not trade or business). I wonder if you have a management company, but you pay all the bills, is that passive income for purposes of the 3.8% tax, while still considered a “trade or business” for purposes of the 1099 reporting requirements?


78 posted on 09/30/2010 2:22:24 PM PDT by keepitreal ( Good manners never go out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret
Title IX Revenue Provisions—Subtitle A: Revenue Offset “(Sec. 9002) Requires employers to include in the W-2 form of each employee the aggregate cost of applicable employer-sponsored group health coverage that is excludable from the employee’s gross income (excluding the value of contributions to flexible spending arrangements).”

I got this e-mail today. Anyone know if it is true?

Only partially true, and not the part that is the most concern. The new rule is that the cost of health insurance is to be reported on the W-2, but not as gross income. Currently, your employer is required to report other items, like 401(k) contributions, on your W-2, but you are not taxed on them. There is a limit to the contributions, so that is why they are reported. So, now the government wants to know how much your health insurance plan is. This is probably either to make sure your coverage meets their minimum or in preparation for taxing you on it, either one not good. But, so far, that amount will not be added to your taxable income.

79 posted on 09/30/2010 2:23:06 PM PDT by tnlibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

One would reply with an accounting of such purchases as they would be taxed under the tax code, with such supporting information as web merchant confirmation emails, screen shots, packing receipts, etc. to account for the credit card transactions the state is pointing at. Enough people do that and state tax departments will be snowed under.


My point is how many of us have the time to defend ourselves and talk to the computer that sent the letter and bill. It will us that gets snowed under.............


80 posted on 09/30/2010 2:23:06 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson