To: Robbin
Not sure I agree with you. If the NRA endorses no Dems, they lose all influence with them. Plus if Reid loses and the Dems keep the Senate, Schumer takes over as majority leader. Bad to much worse.
Not saying you are wrong, but I intend to keep my membership.
34 posted on
09/29/2010 7:28:42 PM PDT by
tickmeister
(tickmeister)
To: tickmeister
I think you may be on to something insightful there.
To: tickmeister
If a Democrat wants to be pro-gun or pro-life-GET OUT OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!
111 posted on
09/30/2010 6:51:44 AM PDT by
fortheDeclaration
(When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
To: tickmeister
Not sure I agree with you. If the NRA endorses no Dems, they lose all influence with them. Plus if Reid loses and the Dems keep the Senate, Schumer takes over as majority leader. Bad to much worse."Influence" with the Democrats WRT the Second Ammendment means exactly *spit*.
Personally, I've come to the conclusion that the NRA's first priority is the financial position of the NRA. They've set up a system where they need bogeymen to gin up panicky junk mail and the associated income, so they do what they can to ensure they have enough bogeymen to maintain the system. Ain't K Street great!
114 posted on
09/30/2010 6:56:01 AM PDT by
AngryJawa
(Obama's Success is America's Failure)
To: tickmeister
Here in Nevada the NRA has supported Reid in the past. They have not done it (mostly due to the blowback) this cycle. They have NOT endorsed Sharron Angle who is more of a Constitutionalist that any 20 Dems combined. Why? Covering their bet with Reid. Makes me ill.
123 posted on
09/30/2010 7:39:47 AM PDT by
mad_as_he$$
(Playing by the rules only works if both sides do it!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson