The guy Ravi taped was his roommate and was gay. Ravi was tired of walking into his dorm room and catching his roommate being intimate with guys. So he decided to tape him. Bad situation all around.
perhaps the family did not know and would have disowned him if they found out.
either way this does seem to be a stalking type situation and worthy of at least manslaughter charges.
Where did you read any of that? Or did you make it up?
I get the first part. The second part, not so much.
“The guy Ravi taped was his roommate and was gay. Ravi was tired of walking into his dorm room and catching his roommate being intimate with guys. So he decided to tape him. Bad situation all around.”
The issue at at the root of this, then, is that the university trampled Ravi’s God-given right to avoid the society of sodomites.
“Ravi was tired of walking into his dorm room and catching his roommate being intimate with guys”
The article accompanying this story on another thread stated that the deceased asked for use of the room until midnight.
From that article-
“Roommate asked for the room till midnight,” read the post from Dharun Ravi, 18. “I went into Molly’s room and turned on my webcam. I saw him making out with a dude. Yay.”