Replies

1 posted on 09/29/2010 2:00:36 PM PDT by Neidermeyer

To: Neidermeyer

Very good advice.

2 posted on 09/29/2010 2:04:14 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker

To: Chunga85

PING!!

3 posted on 09/29/2010 2:06:29 PM PDT by Roccus (......and then there were none.)

To: Neidermeyer

oops , “police” = “policy”

4 posted on 09/29/2010 2:13:18 PM PDT by Neidermeyer

To: Neidermeyer

This is a very good tactic in this day and age.

The first case where someone loses their home because the repo by the bank was based upon fraudulent information is going to blow sky-high.

All I can say is: “About time.” We’ve known for two years that the banks are lying sacks of crap.

Finally the court system is demanding they show proof they actually hold the note, and that the paperwork has been done correctly.

5 posted on 09/29/2010 2:32:17 PM PDT by NVDave

To: Neidermeyer

I got lambasted as "anti-business" or something for posting about the Vietnam Vet who got flung in the streets by foreclosure mill thugs a while ago.

Ice Legal, the firm that depo'd GMAC robo-signor causing them to halt foreclosures in 23 states has taken his case Pro Bono.

7 posted on 09/29/2010 2:51:24 PM PDT by Chunga85 ("Foreclosure Fraud", TARP, "Mortgage Crisis", Bailout)

To: Neidermeyer

bttt

10 posted on 09/29/2010 3:46:27 PM PDT by Matchett-PI (The 'RAT Party - Home of our most envious, hypocritical, and greedy citizens.)

To: Neidermeyer

bad papers mean undenforcable mortgages mean dismissal with prejudice.

12 posted on 09/29/2010 3:52:38 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794